ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
New Surgical Devices for Closed Reduction of Frontal Sinus Bone Fracture.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional surgical interventions for frontal sinus fractures necessitate a cut on the forehead skin, and extant closed reduction techniques aimed at enhancing accessibility continue to grapple with secure tool fixation, stable bone elevation, and screw breakage risk. To address these challenges and augment surgical efficiency, this study introduces novel surgical devices. Design parameters for models with spiral or L-shaped tips are established, considering practical medical requirements and constraints, and subsequently validated through finite element method numerical simulations using commercial software, Ansys. Four spiral-type prototypes are constructed, and three scenarios for each prototype, varying in projection distance from the device handle to the bone-device contact point, are examined via nonlinear simulation analyses. For the L-shaped type, three prototypes are developed, and static analyses are conducted for four scenarios per prototype, differing in traction force locations, based on another simulation result concerning moments of inertia calculation with a force boundary condition unlike pressure. Maximum stress results under a specific force are analyzed, and the maximum permissible force is determined under the most unfavorable force application condition. Simulation outcomes indicate that the spiral type offers greater applicability with less force to lift multiple bones, while the L-shaped type is more suitable under bone hardening conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.