Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254467›Full record

ArticlePediatric dermatology

Patient-Reported Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Disease: Results of a Real-World, Cross-Sectional Survey.

Lawrence F Eichenfield, Vivian Y Shi, JiaDe Yu, Evangeline J Pierce, Amber Reck Atwater, Jenny Austin, Peter Anderson, Amy S Paller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lawrence F EichenfieldDepartment of Dermatology and Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-0474
Vivian Y ShiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7510-9428
JiaDe YuDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-3170
Evangeline J PierceEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8287-2835
Amber Reck AtwaterEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-0014
Jenny AustinAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4297-6290
Peter AndersonAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-8228
Amy S PallerDepartment of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-6549

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common and burdensome disease. Treatment options for pediatric and adolescent patients (< 18 years old) with moderate-to-severe AD are limited, and real-world data on disease burden are lacking. This study examined patient-reported disease burden and treatments in pediatric and adolescent patients to identify opportunities for patient benefit. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Pediatric AD Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey of physicians and patients < 18 years old, conducted in Europe and the United States between February-June 2019. Physicians documented demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment history. Patients and/or their caregivers described disease burden, the degree of symptomatic bother, and quality of life (QoL). Data from 772 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were analyzed (pediatric; n = 393, 0-11 years, adolescent; n = 379, 12-17 years). Adolescents were more likely to be receiving a systemic corticosteroid (24% vs. 12%), phototherapy (15% vs. 6%), systemic immunosuppressant (15% vs. 6%) or a biologic treatment (5% vs. 1%) than pediatric patients (p < 0.0001). Two-thirds of patients had a high degree of "bother" from itch, and 38% reporting itch as the "most bothersome" symptom. More adolescent patients reported "bother" related to anxiety than pediatric patients (67% vs. 49%, p < 0.0001). Adolescent patients reported a significantly higher burden of embarrassment/self-consciousness (p < 0.0001) and AD impact on friendships (p < 0.05). Disease burden differed between pediatric and adolescent patients with AD. Treatment considerations for pediatric and adolescent patients with AD should take into account these factors, with future research directed toward improving the QoL in these patients.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDermatitis, AtopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansInfantMaleSeverity of Illness IndexUnited Statesadolescentatopic dermatitisdisease burdenpediatrictreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID40254467
PMCPMC12118527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.