ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025
A basic study on the mechanical properties of synthetic absorbable sutures under various pH conditions in vitro.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suture Materials: Conventional and Stimulatory-Responsive Absorbable Polymers with Biomimetic Function.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In veterinary surgery, the choice of suture is determined by the surgeon based on a combination of factors, such as differences in disassembly time, price, and suture site. However, no unified comparison has been made across companies, and the differences are often unclear. In this study, we compared the mechanical properties (maximum tensile load, maximum extension, and maximum twist) of seven synthetic absorbable sutures at baseline (day 0) and over time under different pH conditions (PBS: pH 7.2, acidic: pH 5.6, alkaline: pH 8.8). At baseline, the comparison showed no significant difference in tensile load, but monofilament sutures exhibited a significantly higher extension than multifilament sutures. In terms of twist, the results varied, with significantly higher values for PDS II and MonoSynthe, both of which are polydioxanone based, suggesting that material differences may have influenced the results. On the other hand, multifilament sutures showed lower values over time in all conditions compared to monofilament sutures. Therefore, it was concluded that multifilaments were more strongly affected by solution immersion than monofilaments and lost their mechanical properties earlier. The results also revealed distinct patterns in twist behavior over time, especially MonoSynthe exhibited much lower twist values under alkaline pH compared to other monofilament sutures. These results suggest that twist could be a valuable addition to conventional evaluation methods for suture characteristics. Further multifaceted evaluations will contribute to the development of more comprehensive selection criteria for sutures used in veterinary clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.