ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Scaling up thrombectomy care in transitioning health systems: a qualitative study of stroke centres in Canada.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndovascular thrombectomy has shown significant benefits for patients with large-vessel ischaemic stroke. However, many countries face challenges establishing effective thrombectomy delivery systems, even when thrombolysis services are already in place. Moreover, there is limited research on implementing thrombectomy care delivery, particularly for scale-ups in low- and middle-income countries. This study identifies the key drivers of enhancing thrombectomy delivery systems in three Canadian regions and provides lessons for health systems in transition.
methodsA qualitative research design with a phenomenological approach was employed. From January to December 2022, at three comprehensive ischaemic stroke centres in Canada, we involved non-participant observation and in-depth interviews with 91 key informants, including care providers and administrators engaged in large-vessel stroke care. Guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework, the data were transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis.
resultsThree critical themes emerged. First, establishing a cohesive, goal-oriented, multidisciplinary patient care team with an egalitarian culture is vital. Second, integrating specific feedback data is essential for continuous quality improvement and for optimising workflow through collective leadership. Lastly, even with existing thrombolytic services, centralised regional planning and outreach to local thrombectomy implementers is necessary. Development must occur at stroke centres and their associated peripheral hospitals to build effective thrombectomy care delivery systems.
conclusionsEnhancing thrombectomy care delivery systems requires a stepwise approach: first, establishing multidisciplinary teams at the micro-level; next, fostering collective leadership for continuous quality improvement at the meso-level and finally, coordinating regional outreach and centralised planning at the macro-level. The Canadian experience highlights the importance of addressing these interconnected levels and underscores the critical role of central planning and collaboration between policymakers and care providers. These strategies offer a structured pathway for improving stroke care globally, particularly in transitioning health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.