ArticleSaudi medical journal2025
Comparative study of pregnancy risks in different maternal age groups.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prenatal n-3 LC-PUFA intake and the incidence of allergic diseases in offspring: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal age and the predictive performance of the uterine artery pulsatility index for composite adverse perinatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The effect of maternal infections on birth outcomes at King Abdulaziz medical city: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Early socioeconomic conditions to children's trait resilience: longitudinal mediation effects of mothers' and fathers' parenting.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- HIF-1A Expression in Placenta of Pregnancies Complicated with Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate and compare pregnancy complications associated with varying maternal age groups.
methodsA retrospective analysis of singleton pregnancy outcomes at Bahrain Defense Force Hospital from January to December 2022. The study population was divided into 4 age groups: <25 years, 25-29 years, 30-34 years, and ≥35 years. Data on demographics, maternal and fetal characteristics were collected, and statistical significance was set at
resultsThe study included 2,972 women aged 17-55. Significant associations were found between maternal age and outcomes. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly linked to age (
conclusionMaternal age is an independent risk factor for various adverse outcomes. Younger women (<25) are at higher risk for preterm delivery and IUGR, while older women (≥35) have higher rates of GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.