Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40253888›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2025

Separation of powers: A key feature underlying the neuroprotective role of Retromer in age-related neurodegenerative disease?

Brett M Collins, Peter J Cullen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. VPS29C: Adding complexity to the Retromer complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Identification of a VPS29 isoform with restricted association to Retriever and Retromer accessory proteins through autoinhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brett M CollinsThe University of Queensland, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia. Electronic address: b.collins@imb.uq.edu.au.
Peter J CullenSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. Electronic address: pete.cullen@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retromer complex was discovered in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a multiprotein, pentameric assembly essential for recycling of integral membrane cargo proteins through the endosomal network [1,2]. We now understand how retromer is assembled, its membrane architecture, and how it selects proteins for recycling [3-6]. Conserved across eukaryotes, analyses have revealed retromer's role in organism development, and homeostasis and has linked retromer defects with age-related Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease and other neurological disorders [3,5,7]. Indeed, stabilizing retromer function is now actively considered a therapeutic strategy [8]. Here, we reflect on its structural and functional evolution rather than overviewing retromer biology (see, e.g. [5,7]). Specifically, we clarify the organization of the human retromer to provide greater focus for future research, especially within the context of retromer's function in neuroprotection.

Indexed as

AgingNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuroprotectionAnimalsEndosomesHumansVesicular Transport ProteinsVesicular Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40253888
PMCPMC7618989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.