ArticleJournal of hazardous materials2025
Rapid detection of microplastics and nanoplastics in seconds by mass spectrometry.
Article in Journal of hazardous materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polystyrene nanoplastics disrupt mouse placenta development in a sex-dependent manner.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Emerging analytical technologies for detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in food: bridging challenges and innovations.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Optical, Chemical, and Biological Detection Methods of Microplastics and Nanoplastics.ACS measurement science au · 2026Review
- Polystyrene Nanoplastics Disrupt Mouse Placenta Development in a Sex-Dependent Manner.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) are pervasive pollutants and their analyses by traditional mass spectrometric methods require time-intensive sample preparation (e.g., extraction, digestion, and separation). This study presents a rapid and novel method for detecting MPs and NPs using flame ionization mass spectrometry (FI-MS) in which a dried sample (e.g., powder, soil and tissue) is directly burnt or heated with a flame in front of the MS inlet. FI-MS enables decomposition and ionization of various plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polystyrene (PS), allowing for analysis to be completed as fast as 10 seconds per sample. As a demonstration of application of this technique, PET contaminants in 1 L of bottled water or in 0.65 L of apple juice contained in plastic bottles were quickly detected from a filter paper after sample filtration and brief drying. A 0.89 mg soil sample spiked with 6000 ppm PET microplastics was measured to contain 4.98 µg of PET (5595 ppm, quantitation error: 6.8 %). Strikingly, PS nanoplastics (200 nm size) in mouse placentas were successfully identified and quantified, highlighting the method's ability to analyze biological tissue without tedious sample preparation. Overall, this study demonstrates the high potential of FI-MS for real-world sample analysis of MPs and NPs in environmental, biological, or consumer product samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.