ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2025
Prospective clinical study to evaluate the success and survival of two-piece zirconia implants: a single-center study. 12-month results.
Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- When bioactivity comes at a mechanical cost: toward mechanically safe bioactivation of zirconia dental implants.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Ceramic Dental Implants: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of a two-piece zirconia dental implant system.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Prospective clinical study to evaluate the survival of two-piece zirconia implants: a single-center study. 36-month results.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Quality Characteristics of Poultry Products Containing Plant Components with Enhanced Health Benefits.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of Immediately Restored, Surface Modified Two-Piece Zirconia Implants. A Prospective Case Series.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the survival and success rates of a novel two-piece zirconia implant system restored with screw-retained glass-ceramic crowns over 12 months, including assessment of bone levels, soft tissue parameters, and patient-reported outcome measures.
methodsTwenty-four patients received single two-piece zirconia implants (CERALOG
resultsThe implant survival rate at 12 months was 60.9%. Nine implants were lost: two due to lack of osseointegration at re-entry, four due to mobility after loading, and three due to fractures in the coronal third after loading. Surviving implants showed stable soft tissue parameters with mean probing pocket depths of 2.7 ± 0.7 mm at 12 months. The mean distance from implant shoulder to first bone contact decreased from 1.9 ± 0.6 mm at loading to 1.4 ± 0.6 mm at 12 months. Patients with surviving implants reported high satisfaction scores (4.8 ± 0.4) for function and aesthetics.
conclusionsThe two-piece zirconia implant system with screw-retained restorations showed unsatisfactory survival rates. The combination of ceramic implants with screw-retained prosthetic restorations may have contributed to the higher failure rates observed. As a pilot study with a relatively small sample size, these findings should be confirmed by larger multicenter studies to validate these preliminary results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.