Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40253620›Full record

ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2025

Biomarker-guided adaptive enrichment design with threshold detection for clinical trials with time-to-event outcome.

Kaiyuan Hua, Hwanhee Hong, Xiaofei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaiyuan HuaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Hwanhee HongDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Xiaofei WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7512-8445

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Transforming Clinical Trials for Elderly and Rare Cancers through Intelligent and Robust Information BorrowingR01AG066883 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Xiaofei Wang, Shu Yang · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
Combining data sources to identify effect moderation for personalized mental health treatmentR01MH126856 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STUART, ELIZABETH A. · 2021 to 2024
$1.7M
FDA HHS U01 FD007934NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066883NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarker-guided designs are increasingly used to evaluate personalized treatments based on patients' biomarker status in Phase II and III clinical trials. With adaptive enrichment, these designs can improve the efficiency of evaluating the treatment effect in biomarker-positive patients by increasing their proportion in the randomized trial. While time-to-event outcomes are often used as the primary endpoint to measure treatment effects for a new therapy in severe diseases like cancer and cardiovascular diseases, there is limited research on biomarker-guided adaptive enrichment trials in this context. Such trials almost always adopt hazard ratio methods for statistical measurement of treatment effects. In contrast, restricted mean survival time (RMST) has gained popularity for analyzing time-to-event outcomes because it offers more straightforward interpretations of treatment effects and does not require the proportional hazard assumption. This paper proposes a two-stage biomarker-guided adaptive RMST design with threshold detection and patient enrichment. We develop sophisticated methods for identifying the optimal biomarker threshold and biomarker-positive subgroup, treatment effect estimators, and approaches for type I error rate, power analysis, and sample size calculation. We present a numerical example of re-designing an oncology trial. An extensive simulation study is conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed design.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationEndpoint DeterminationHumansPrecision MedicineSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersBiomarker adaptive designcontinuous biomarkerpatient enrichmentrestricted mean survival timethreshold detection

Identifiers

PMID40253620
PMCPMC12353384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.