Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Proteinuria in preterm neonates: influence of fetal growth restriction.
Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Placental dysfunction drives fetal growth restriction: mechanisms and translational perspectives.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare proteinuria in preterm neonates with fetal growth restriction-small for gestational age (FGR-SGA) against equally preterm but appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. STUDY
designProspective, observational cohort study.
resultsEighteen FGR-SGA neonates were compared with 18 AGA neonates (gestation; 29 ± 1 vs 29 ± 2 weeks, P = 0.8). Urine total protein (median [interquartile range]) in FGR-SGA was higher 370 [323, 573] vs 255 [193, 453] mg/L in AGA, P = 0.017 at first assessment (week one) and 565 [445, 743] vs 225 [135, 458] mg/L, P = 0.0011 at second assessment (week four). Urine protein creatinine ratio was 393 [250, 445] in FGR-SGA vs 227 [163, 367] mg/mmol in AGA, P = 0.029 at first assessment and 444 [368, 699] vs 240 [199, 411] mg/mmol, P = 0.0014 at second assessment. Mean blood pressure was higher in FGR-SGA group & directly correlated with proteinuria.
conclusionsIncreased proteinuria in FGR-SGA suggests reduced nephron endowment and hyper-filtration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.