ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Prognostic value of combined nutritional and inflammatory markers in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic significance of the pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in colorectal cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis with 24 cohort studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Dynamic machine learning model integrating resting energy expenditure for predicting postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical phenotype identification based on inflammation-nutrition-coagulation biomarkers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have markedly improved patient survival, yet some patients do not benefit. The existing prognostic factors are limited, highlighting the development of reliable and convenient predictive indicators.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 219 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from June 2019 to January 2024. The nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were employed to evaluate the patients' nutritional status and inflammatory response, aiming to investigate the correlation between these markers and treatment outcomes.
resultsThe median follow-up duration for the overall population was 29 (IQR: 25.96-32.04) months. The analysis showed that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) in the high nutritional risk group (NRS2002 ≥ 3, accounting for 23.74%) were significantly lower than those in the low nutritional risk group (NRS2002 < 3, accounting for 76.26%) (mPFS: 2.5 vs 16 months; mOS: 8 vs 16 months, both P < 0.001). Similarly, patients with high NLR values (> 4.92) had significantly shorter OS and PFS than those with low NLR (≤ 4.92) values (mOS: 7 vs 18 months; mPFS: 3 vs 17 months, both P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that a high NRS 2002 score (HR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.68-4.54, P < 0.001) and high NLR (HR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.65-4.64, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor prognosis. Risk stratification was performed using a combined scoring system of NRS 2002 and NLR (0 points-low risk, 1 point-moderate risk, 2 points-high risk), and it was found that as the risk score increased, OS and PFS significantly decreased (mOS: 8 [2.61-13.39] vs 16 [13.04-18.96] vs NA [NA-NA] months; mPFS: 2.5 [0.99-4.02] vs 8.5 [5.47-11.53] vs 16 [11.41-20.59] months, respectively, both P < 0.001). The utility of the combined NLR and NRS2002 scoring model was assessed using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with results indicating that at 12 months, the AUC value of the combined scoring model was 0.81 (CI 0.72-0.90). At 24 and 36 months, the AUC values were 0.73 (CI 0.66-0.80) and 0.70 (CI 0.64-0.76), respectively. Moreover, the nomogram model exhibited high predictive accuracy in predicting survival prognosis, with AUC values of 0.84 (CI 0.77-0.91), 0.85 (CI 0.79-0.91), and 0.78 (CI 0.69-0.88) at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively.
conclusionThe combined NRS 2002 and NLR scoring can serve as an effective prognostic tool for NSCLC patients receiving ICIs treatment. This scoring system helps clinicians more accurately identify patients who will benefit from immunotherapy, thereby facilitating more personalized treatment plans. Further validation of this scoring system's applicability and reliability is warranted in future multicenter, large-sample prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.