ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of functional electrical stimulation on cognition rate and gait in neurological patients during single- and dual-task walking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal cord injury and functional electrical stimulation: trends and frontiers.Spinal cord · 2026Article
- Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in Adults with Neurological Disorders and Foot Drop: Orthotic and Therapeutic Effects in Short- and Long-Term Users.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with neurological disorders and foot drop may suffer from cognitive-motor interference during walking. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) targets foot drop during gait but its effects on cognition remain underexplored. Fifteen individuals (4 males, 11 females; mean age 35.5 ± 12.5 years) with various neurological disorders, who had been using FES for at least three months, were recruited from our outpatient clinic. Subjects were assessed during walking with and without FES (FES CONDITION) and under single- and dual-task walking (TASK). The dual-task consisted of counting backwards from a number near 100 in steps of seven while walking. Cognition rate served as outcome parameter, with high values indicating subjects could efficiently maintain both cognitive task performance and walking speed. A linear mixed model analysis was conducted with FES CONDITION and TASK as fixed and SUBJECTS as random effects. The cognition rate during dual-task walking was significantly better with FES vs. without. FES showed minor effects on dorsiflexion in swing but larger effects on overall gait, as reflected in walking speed, step length and step width. While dual-task led to inferior results in gait, FES counteracted this effect and improved cognition rate. These findings suggest that FES not only addresses gait pattern and stability but also frees cognitive resources for walking. This shift in focus may enhance environmental awareness, social interaction or multitasking and thereby improving overall independence and quality of life, which is particularly relevant for patients with neurological disorders and an increased risk of falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.