ArticleScientific reports2025
Dual-enzyme activated theranostic nanoparticles for image-guided glioblastoma therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Glioblastoma Targeting and Penetration: Extracellular Matrix Remodeling by Collagenase-Functionalized Ferumoxytol Nanoparticles.Nano letters · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology in Pediatric Neurology: Applications and Innovations.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- The promising role of cathepsins as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in glioblastoma.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Photodynamic Therapy Targeting Matrix Metalloproteases in Cancer: Standpoint for an Innovative Anticancer Strategy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) and Cathepsin-B (Cat-B) are overexpressed in glioblastoma (GBM) and not normal brain, making them promising targets for prodrug activation. We investigated a novel combination therapy using two tumor-enzyme activatable theranostic nanoprobes (TNP): TNP-MMP-14, which disrupts the blood tumor barrier via MMP-14 activation, and TNP-Cat-B, which selectively targets GBM cells through Cat-B activation. We hypothesized that combining TNP-MMP-14 and TNP-Cat-B would enhance TNP tumor accumulation and therapeutic efficacy compared to TNP-Cat-B monotherapy. Thirty NSG mice with luciferase-expressing GBM39 tumors received either TNP-MMP-14 plus TNP-Cat-B, TNP-Cat-B only, or saline. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was conducted pre- and post-treatment, with T2* relaxation times analyzed using a generalized linear model. Histopathological differences were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. A Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons. Combination therapy significantly reduced tumor T2* relaxation times (12.98 ± 4.20 ms) compared to TNP-Cat-B monotherapy (22.49 ± 3.95 ms, p < 0.001). The apoptotic marker caspase-3 was also significantly higher in the combination group (64.46 ± 23.43 vs. 15.93 ± 5.81, p < 0.001). These findings demonstrate the potential of dual-enzyme activatable nanoparticles to enhance GBM treatment by overcoming drug delivery barriers and improving therapeutic efficacy over monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.