Observational studyScientific reports2025
The impact of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors as starting treatment in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer on patient outcomes (OASIS Japan).
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World PSA Response and Overall Survival Among Men with mCSPC Receiving Apalutamide Versus Darolutamide (Both Without Docetaxel) in the US.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Real-World Longitudinal Treatment Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in Japan.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference-JAPAN 2025 at the 112Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in Japan: A Retrospective Health Administrative Data Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the impact of starting treatment on clinical outcomes in men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This retrospective observational cohort study used claims data from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) hospital-based administrative dataset in Japan. All patients with newly diagnosed mCSPC from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2024 were enrolled and followed up until 30 September 2024. Time-to-event analyses used Kaplan-Meier methods. The risk of death, onset of castration resistance, time to ≥ 50% PSA decline (PSA50), ≥ 90% PSA decline (PSA90), and undetectable PSA level (≤ 0.2 ng/mL) was compared between androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and combined androgen blockade (CAB) or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, body mass index, co-morbidities, visceral metastases, and baseline PSA. 22,559 patients with mCSPC had received relevant treatment of whom 15,797 were included in the analysis: 1167 (5.2%) started on apalutamide (APA) + ADT, 1407 (6.2%) on enzalutamide + ADT, 1262 (5.6%) on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone + ADT, and 11,961 (53.0%) on CAB/ADT alone. The median age was between 74 and 78 years in each group. Bone metastases were present in 60.5% to 72.6% of patients, visceral metastases in 2.8% to 5.7%, and nodal metastases in 19.3% to 29.4%. Overall survival and castration resistance-free survival were significantly longer in patients initially treated with APA + ADT compared to CAB/ADT (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In patients with regular PSA assessment, a higher percentage of patients starting with APA + ADT achieved PSA50, PSA90 and undetectable PSA at 3 months compared with CAB/ADT (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0005, p < 0.0001, respectively). Use of APA + ADT as a starting treatment for mCSPC was associated with better clinical outcomes versus traditional CAB or ADT in real-world clinical practice in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.