Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40253428›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A text dataset of campaign speeches of the main tickets in the 2020 US presidential election.

Ioannis Chalkiadakis, Louise Anglès d'Auriac, Gareth W Peters, Divina Frau-Meigs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioannis ChalkiadakisInstitut des Systèmes Complexes de Paris Îlede-France, CNRS, Paris, 75013, France. ioannis.chalkiadakis@cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4111-9836
Louise Anglès d'AuriacED 625 MAGIIE, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, 75012, France.
Gareth W PetersDepartment of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA. garethpeters@ucsb.edu.
Divina Frau-MeigsED 625 MAGIIE, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, 75012, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unstructured text data have gained popularity in political science, owing to advancements in rigorous 'text-as-data' methods that allow extracting insights into election outcomes, candidates' appeal to voters, ideologies and campaign strategies. Existing datasets on US presidential election campaign speeches are limited in size or source variation, and often contain speeches of different types (debates, rallies, official presidential events, e.g. inauguration), thus lacking consistency in their rhetorical content. The introduced dataset comprises the campaign speeches of the Democratic and Republican tickets for the 2020 US presidential election (1, 056 in total), covering the period between January 2019 and January 2021. Importantly, the dataset dictates specific criteria for the rhetorical structure of the speech ensuring consistency, critical for quantitative analysis. It has been carefully curated, yet only to the necessary extent to still be able to inform studies that require semantic or grammatical/syntactical structure. The provided corpus is hosted on Zenodo and GitHub under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, and it aims to enhance timely studies on US presidential elections with high-quality text data.

Identifiers

PMID40253428
PMCPMC12009287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.