ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable machine learning for predicting lung metastasis of colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a prediction model to predict the incidence of metastasis in lung cancer patients using artificial intelligence techniques.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning and nomogram models to predict lung metastasis and prognosticate survival in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Cancer metastasisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Predicting lung metastasis after radical colorectal cancer surgery: a two center retrospective cohort study and nomogram development.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer prediction: from transparency to clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Developing and Interpreting a Machine Learning Model for Identifying Liver Metastasis in Gastric Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with lung metastasis of colorectal cancer typically have a poor prognosis. Therefore, establishing an effective screening and diagnosis model is paramount. Our study seeks to construct and verify a predictive model utilizing machine learning (ML) that can evaluate the risk of lung metastasis with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 39,674 were extracted for model development, all of whom had been pathologically diagnosed with CRC. The data spans from 2010 to 2015. Our study has constructed seven ML algorithms based on the data mentioned above, including Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Gradient Boosting Machine. We selected the best algorithm and visualized it using SHAP. We conducted a validation of the model utilizing data from a Chinese hospital to assess its practicality. Based on this, we have constructed an open web calculator. 39,674 patient data were included in our study, among whom 1369 (3.5%) presented with distant lung metastasis. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm demonstrated the highest predictive capability within the internal test set (AUC of 0.980, AUPR of 0.941). Furthermore, the random forest algorithm also exhibited excellent performance in external validation sets. Meanwhile, we have also established a web calculator ( http://121.43.117.60:8003/ ). The RF algorithm has demonstrated excellent predictive performance. It can assist clinicians in devising more personalized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.