Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40253418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient hybrid heuristic adopted deep learning framework for diagnosing breast cancer using thermography images.

Ahmad Y A Bani Ahmad, Jafar A Alzubi, Manimaran Vasanthan, Suresh Babu Kondaveeti, J Shreyas, Thella Preethi Priyanka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmad Y A Bani AhmadDepartment of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business, Middle East University, Amman, 11831, Jordan.
Jafar A AlzubiFaculty of Engineering, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, 19117, Jordan.
Manimaran VasanthanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, SRM College of Pharmacy, Medicine and health sciences, SRM institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, Tamilnadu, India.
Suresh Babu KondaveetiDepartment of Biochemistry, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, 412115, Maharashtra, India.
J ShreyasDepartment of Information Technology, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 560064, Karnataka, India. shreyas.j@manipal.edu.
Thella Preethi PriyankaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Chennai, 602105, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most dangerous form of cancer is breast cancer. This disease is life-threatening because of its aggressive nature and high death rates. Therefore, early discovery increases the patient's survival. Mammography has recently been recommended as diagnosis technique. Mammography, is expensive and exposure the person to radioactivity. Thermography is a less invasive and affordable technique that is becoming increasingly popular. Considering this, a recent deep learning-based breast cancer diagnosis approach is executed by thermography images. Initially, thermography images are chosen from online sources. The collected thermography images are being preprocessed by Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) and contrasting enhancement methods to improve the quality and brightness of the images. Then, the optimal binary thresholding is done to segment the preprocessed images, where optimized the thresholding value using developed Rock Hyraxes Dandelion Algorithm Optimization (RHDAO). A newly implemented deep learning structure StackVRDNet is used for further processing breast cancer diagnosing using thermography images. The segmented images are fed to the StackVRDNet framework, where the Visual Geometry Group (VGG16), Resnet, and DenseNet are employed for constructing this model. The relevant features are extracted usingVGG16, Resnet, and DenseNet, and then obtain stacked weighted feature pool from the extracted features, where the weight optimization is done with the help of RHDAO. The final classification is performed using StackVRDNet, and the diagnosis results are obtained at the final layer of VGG16, Resnet, and DenseNet. A higher scoring method is rated for ensuring final diagnosis results. Here, the parameters present within the VGG16, Resnet, and DenseNet are optimized via the RHDAO to improve the diagnosis results. The simulation outcomes of the developed model achieve 97.05% and 86.86% in terms of accuracy and precision, respectively. The effectiveness of the designed methd is being analyzed via the conventional breast cancer diagnosis models in terms of various performance measures.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedThermographyAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMammographyBreast cancer classificationOptimal binary thresholdingRock hyraxes dandelion algorithm optimizationStackVDRNetThermogram imagesWeighted fused feature

Identifiers

PMID40253418
PMCPMC12009285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.