ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification and validation of a novel machine learning model for predicting severe pelvic endometriosis: A retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of endometriosis using ultrasound images: a systematic review.Reproductive health · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable machine learning for endometriosis classification: a rule-based approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Associations between aggregate index of systemic inflammation and endometriosis risk utilizing logistic regression analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis by Questionnaires in Patients Using Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore potential risk factors for severe endometriosis and to develop a model to predict the risk of severe endometriosis. A total of 308 patients with endometriosis were analyzed. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was performed to identify the potential risk factors for severe endometriosis. Then, we used seven machine learning (ML) algorithms to construct the predictive models. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretation was performed to evaluate the contributions of each factor to risk prediction. About 59.2% (183/308) of patients were diagnosed with severe endometriosis. The random forest (RF) model performed best in discriminative ability among the seven ML models, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.744. After reducing features according to feature importance rank, an explainable final RF model was established with six features. From the SHAP map, we found that the negative sliding sign had the greatest impact on the diagnostic performance of the RF model. This study provided a personalized risk assessment for the development of severe endometriosis, which may enable early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating timely intervention and optimized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.