ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning unlocks the true potential of organ donation after circulatory death with accurate prediction of time-to-death.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Education and Ethical Guidance for Organ Donation at the End-of-Life: An Ethical Guidance Statement from the Neurocritical Care Society.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- When End-of-Life Becomes the Beginning of New Life: Application of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Adult End-of-Life Care in the ICU to the Setting of Donation After Circulatory Death.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- How Long Do We Have? A Retrospective Review of Palliative Extubation in the Burn Unit.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing the number of organ donations after circulatory death (DCD) has been identified as one of the most important ways of addressing the ongoing organ shortage. While recent technological advances in organ transplantation have increased their success rate, a substantial challenge in increasing the number of DCD donations resides in the uncertainty regarding the timing of cardiac death after terminal extubation, impacting the risk of prolonged ischemic organ injury, and negatively affecting post-transplant outcomes. In this study, we trained and externally validated an ODE-RNN model, which combines recurrent neural network with neural ordinary equations and excels in processing irregularly-sampled time series data. The model is designed to predict time-to-death following terminal extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) using the history of clinical observations. Our model was trained on a cohort of 3,238 patients from Yale New Haven Hospital, and validated on an external cohort of 1,908 patients from six hospitals across Connecticut. The model achieved accuracies of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for predicting whether death would occur in the first 30 and 60 minutes, respectively, with a calibration error of [Formula: see text]. Heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were identified as the most important predictors. Surpassing existing clinical scores, our model sets the stage for reduced organ acquisition costs and improved post-transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.