Trial reportBMC urology2025
Evaluation of postoperative safety and comfort of ureteral stent removal with extraction string in modified split-leg prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Trial report in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical and procedural factors influencing ureteral stent dwell time and removal methods after endourological procedures: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive survey on urological stent practices by the European Association of Urology (EAU) Endourology.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Effects of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and comfort of ureteral stents with extraction strings during modified split-leg prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
methodsA prospective, single-centre study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing PCNL for unilateral upper urinary tract stones from April to August 2024. Patients were randomized into two groups: 50 with extraction-string stents and 50 without. Standardized surgical and postoperative protocols were followed. Primary outcomes included pain scores during stent removal, incidence of hematuria and flank pain, stent indwelling time, and cost analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0.
resultsThe extraction-string group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during stent removal (0.86 ± 0.62 vs. 5.23 ± 1.74, p < 0.05) and shorter stent indwelling time (16.06 ± 4.48 vs. 60.54 ± 20.4 days, p < 0.05). The incidence of hematuria (8 vs. 29 cases) and flank pain (7 vs. 22 cases) was notably lower in the extraction-string group (p < 0.05). Additionally, each patient in this group saved an average of 1,065 Yuan (145.78 USD) by avoiding cystoscopic removal. No significant differences were observed in postoperative hospitalization days or urinary irritation symptoms (p > 0.05).
conclusionThe use of extraction-string ureteral stents during modified split-leg prone PCNL significantly reduces stent removal pain, enhances procedural convenience, lowers economic burden, and maintains a safety profile comparable to traditional methods. This innovative technique represents a clinically valuable advancement in PCNL surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.