ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Predicting Nottingham grade in breast cancer digital pathology using a foundation model.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological and Immunohistochemical Correlation of Stromal CD10 Expression in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Prospective Observational Study.Iranian journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Molecular cartography of breast cancer: decoding genomes, heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment for personalized targeted therapeutics.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Gene driven analytical learning model for accurate breast cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- How artificial intelligence applied to digital pathology could guide treatment personalization in breast cancer.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- A Systematic Literature Review on Integrated Deep Learning and Multiagent Vision-Language Frameworks for Pathology Image Analysis and Report Generation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- The New Era of Precision Oncology. Practicing Pathology in Low Resource Countries and Settings.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning models based on magnetic resonance imaging for predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Invasive Breast Cancer.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Nottingham histologic grade is crucial for assessing severity and predicting prognosis in breast cancer, a prevalent cancer worldwide. Traditional grading systems rely on subjective expert judgment and require extensive pathological expertise, are time-consuming, and often lead to inter-observer variability.
methodsTo address these limitations, we develop an AI-based model to predict Nottingham grade from whole-slide images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained breast cancer tissue using a pathology foundation model. From TCGA database, we trained and evaluated using 521 H&E breast cancer slide images with available Nottingham scores through internal split validation, and further validated its clinical utility using an additional set of 597 cases without Nottingham scores. The model leveraged deep features extracted from a pathology foundation model (UNI) and incorporated 14 distinct multiple instance learning (MIL) algorithms.
resultsThe best-performing model achieved an F1 score of 0.731 and a multiclass average AUC of 0.835. The top 300 genes correlated with model predictions were significantly enriched in pathways related to cell division and chromosome segregation, supporting the model's biological relevance. The predicted grades demonstrated statistically significant association with 5-year overall survival (p < 0.05).
conclusionOur AI-based automated Nottingham grading system provides an efficient and reproducible tool for breast cancer assessment, offering potential for standardization of histologic grade in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.