Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40253352›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

The impact of mentoring relationships on professional identity formation in medical education: a systematic review.

Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Nila Ravindran, Hannah Yi Fang Kwok, Xuan Yu Tan, Jasper Soh, Elizabeth Yong Mei Leong, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Tiat Yan Low, Aiden Wei-Jun Chan, Nicholas Chong Jin Lim and 18 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reflections on implementing a collaborative professional practice learning experience for respiratory therapy students in Alberta.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna *Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. gmslkrk@nus.edu.sg.
Nila Ravindran *Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Hannah Yi Fang KwokDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Xuan Yu TanCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Jasper SohCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Elizabeth Yong Mei LeongDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Darius Wei Jun WanCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Tiat Yan LowCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Aiden Wei-Jun ChanCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Nicholas Chong Jin LimCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Yen Kit NgCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Arthena Anushka ThenpandiyanCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Jun Rey LeongCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Adele Yi Dawn LimCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Elaine Li Ying QuahCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Leia Ning TseCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Sriram PlCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Sri Priyanka RajanalaCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Jun Kiat LuaCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Varsha RajalingamCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Victoria Jia En FamDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Ranitha GovindasamyDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Nur Amira Binte AbdulHamidDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Crystal LimMedical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Block 3, Singapore, 169854, Singapore.
Eng Koon OngDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Shin Wei SimGeylang Polyclinic (National Healthcare Group Polyclinics), 21 Geylang East Central, Singapore, 389707, Singapore.
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
Simon Yew Kuang OngDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe promise that enduring and personalised mentoring relationships shape how mentees think, feel and act as professionals, or their professional identity formation (PIF), and thus how they interact, care and support patients and families has garnered significant interest. However, efforts to marshall these elements have been limited due to a lack of effective understanding. To address this lacunae, a systematic scoping review was carried out to map current knowledge on mentoring relationships and its impact on PIF.

methodsGuided by PRISMA guidelines and the Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) to ensure a consistent and reproducible review, independent searches and appraisals of relevant articles published between 1st January 2000 and 4th December 2024 on PubMed, Embase, ERIC and Scopus databases were performed. Data from included articles were content and thematically analysed. Related themes and categories were combined using the SEBA methodology.

results248 articles were identified across four databases and snowballing of key articles. A total of 27 articles were included. The domains identified were: (1) the mentoring ecosystem; (2) mentoring dynamics; (3) shifts in belief systems and professional identity; and (4) complex adaptive systems.

conclusionsThe mentoring programme can be seen as a mentoring ecosystem, functioning as a community of practice and supporting the socialisation process within its boundaries and along the mentoring trajectory. The culture and structure of the mentoring ecosystem help inculcate the shared belief systems and programme identity. It also nurtures stakeholder investment and commitment, as well as their internal compass which is key to contending with the complex array of influences upon their development. Through the lens of a complex adaptive system, it is also possible to appreciate transitions between roles and responsibilities and the notion of being and becoming. These findings underline the evolving nature of practice and the need for personalised and longitudinal mentoring support.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalMentoringSocial IdentificationHumansMentorsCommunity of practiceMedical schoolsMedicineMentoringMentoring relationshipsPersonhoodProfessional identity formationSocialisation process

Identifiers

PMID40253352
PMCPMC12008893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.