Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Intranasal insulin for improving cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.
Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intranasal vs. Device-Assisted Drug Delivery: Advantages and Limitations for the Delivery of Biopharmaceuticals to the CNS.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Lipid-Based Nanocarriers for Intranasal Delivery: Revolutionizing Neurological Disorder Therapies.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- The Potential of β-Synuclein-Specific Regulatory T Cell Therapy as a Treatment for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is common in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). There is an urgent need to identify/develop novel therapies that can help cognitive function in MS. Insulin is critical for helping with regulation of multiple CNS functions, including learning and memory. Insulin administrated intranasally has shown to improve memory and learning in healthy people and in those with some neurodegenerative disorders. Hence, there was rationale for investigating intranasal insulin in PwMS who experience cognitive impairment. We completed a phase Ib/II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion, stratified by relapsing versus progressive MS, to intranasal insulin 10 international units (IU) twice a day, 20 IU twice a day, or placebo for 24 weeks. One-hundred and five PwMS were enrolled, 69 of whom had at least one follow up visit during the active treatment phase of the trial (baseline to week 24). The cohort's mean age was 52.4 ± 9.7years, 62 % were female, and ∼60 % had relapsing-remitting MS. The most common side effects amongst treatment groups included headache, rhinorrhea, and dizziness. There were 13 SAEs which were not deemed study drug related; there were no deaths. The main clinical outcome measure, SDMT, did not demonstrate any difference between intranasal insulin and placebo. Similar findings were noted for all secondary outcome measures. Intranasal insulin appeared safe and well-tolerated in PwMS. However, it was not superior to placebo in any of the clinical outcome measures assessed, which could have been impacted by the duration of the trial, small sample size for a three-arm trial design, data missingness (particularly during COVID-19), outcome measure insensitivity to change, baseline cognitive reserve, or other factors. Nonetheless, intranasally-administered therapeutics may be of interest to develop further as a way to get across the blood brain barrier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.