ArticleNeuroImage2025
Spatiotemporal processing of real faces is modified by visual sensing.
Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Live human faces, when engaged as visual stimuli, recruit unique and extensive patterns of neural activity. However, the underlying neural mechanisms that underly these live face-to-face processes are not known. We hypothesized that the neural correlates for live face processes are modulated by both spatial and temporal features of the live faces as well as visual sensing parameters. Hemodynamic signals detected by functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were acquired concurrently with co-activated electroencephalographic (EEG) and eye-tracking signals during interactive gaze at a live human face or gaze at a human-like robot face. Regression of the fNIRS signals with two eye-gaze variables, fixation duration and dwell time, revealed separate regions of neural correlates, right supramarginal gyrus (lateral visual stream) and right inferior parietal sulcus (dorsal visual stream), respectively. These two areas served as the regions of interest for the EEG analysis. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) was applied to determine theta (4 - 7 Hz) and alpha (8-13 Hz) oscillatory activity in these regions. Variations in oscillatory patterns corresponding to the neural correlates of the visual sensing parameters suggest an increase in spatial binding for the dorsal relative to the lateral regions of interest during live face-to-face visual stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.