ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2025
Redeveloping Low-Income Communities and Residents' Mental Health: Evidence From a Natural Experiment in Watts, Los Angeles.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe role of housing and the built and social environments is understudied as a social determinant of mental health. This study leverages a natural experiment created by the ongoing redevelopment of a public housing community to examine the effects of simultaneously improving the housing, built, and social environments on mental health for low-income, minoritized residents.
methodsThis study analyzed longitudinal data from adult participants in the Watts Neighborhood Health Study. The cohort study includes residents in the public housing community being redeveloped (treatment group) and those in two nearby public housing sites (comparison group) in Watts, Los Angeles. ANCOVA regression models were used to examine whether residents in the treatment group had better mental health scores at follow-up (2021-22) compared to residents in the comparison group, conditional on mental health scores at baseline (2018-19) and other covariates. The analyses leveraged plausibly exogenous variation within the treatment group in exposure to the redevelopment to examine whether mental health at follow-up varied differentially by proximity to the redeveloped areas.
resultsAnalyses showed the treatment group experienced slightly fewer depressive symptoms than the comparison group at follow-up. They also revealed a non-linear relationship between proximity to redeveloped areas and residents' mental health within the treatment group.
conclusionsComprehensive redevelopment of low-income minoritized communities is a complex process that entails uneven mental health impacts on residents in the short term. Strategies to help spread these benefits more evenly may be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.