ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2025
Characterizing the Documentation of Time-Limited Trials in Goals of Care Notes.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextTime-limited trials (TLTs) are a collaborative plan among clinicians, patients, and surrogates to use life-sustaining therapy for a defined duration, after which the response to therapy informs the decision to either continue care focused on recovery or transition to comfort-focused care.
objectivesTo evaluate 1) how often goals of care (GOC) notes document TLT use; 2) what patient and clinician characteristics are associated with documented TLTs; and 3) how TLTs are described in GOC documentation.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of documented standardized GOC template notes for seriously ill hospitalized adult patients across 21-hospitals between 2021 and 2023. We evaluated notes using descriptive statistics paired with qualitative, directed content analysis.
resultsOf 5475 GOC-template notes, we found reference to a TLT in 1% (n = 69/5475). Patients with TLT documentation were younger (72 vs 76 years, P = 0.0221), more likely to be self-pay or uninsured (7% vs. 2%, P = 0.0309), more likely to die in the hospital (54% vs. 27%, P < 0.0001) or discharge to a long-term acute care hospital (15% vs. 1%, P < 0.0001), when compared to patients with no such documentation. Notes with TLT documentation were more likely to document patient prognosis (94% vs. 79%, P = 0.0009) and less likely to document an accompanying change in patient code status (22% vs. 36%, P = 0.0117).
conclusionsTLTs are rarely documented within a standardized GOC note for seriously ill patients. Future research is needed to identify and address reasons for low documentation of TLTs in the EHR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.