ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2025
Theory of mind deficits in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia.
Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) is a complex socio-cognitive subdomain that is under-researched in neurodegenerative disorders, particularly in persons with primary progressive aphasia. We studied 14 persons with non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfaPPA), and asked two questions: (1) whether persons with nfaPPA have intact or impaired ToM, with emphasis on their false belief attribution abilities, relative to healthy controls; and (2) whether false-belief attribution (a component of ToM) is associated with their syntactic and executive function (EF) abilities. False belief understanding was tested through nonverbal videos, with participants deciding whether the story ending was an appropriate end of each video scenario or not. Syntactic production abilities were measured through repetition of syntactically simple and complex sentences (comprising length-matched complement and adjunct sentences), and EF tasks, specifically, a digit-back and an attention-shifting task. Persons with nfaPPA were less accurate than controls in adapting their reasoning to the false beliefs of other agents in the nonverbal videos of the false belief attribution task. Their false belief attribution performance was significantly predicted primarily by their syntactic production, followed by their EF. The overall findings suggest that persons with nfaPPA may have impaired performances in ToM tasks, due to impairments in basic non-social cognitive functioning, such as syntactic and EF abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.