Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40252313›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2025

Theory of mind deficits in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia.

Eleni Peristeri, Stephanie Durrleman, Sokratis Papageorgiou, Constantin Potagas, Christos Frantzidis, Anastasios Kotrotsios, Nikolaos Scarmeas, Kyrana Tsapkini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eleni PeristeriDepartment of English Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: eperiste@enl.auth.gr.
Stephanie DurrlemanDepartment of Linguistics, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Sokratis PapageorgiouDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Constantin PotagasDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Christos FrantzidisSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Anastasios KotrotsiosSchool of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Nikolaos ScarmeasDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Kyrana TsapkiniDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in spoken and written production in primary progressive aphasiaR01DC014475 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TSAPKINI, KYRANA · 2015 to 2019
$4.1M
Transcranial direct current stimulation in typical and atypical Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG068881 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TSAPKINI, KYRANA · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068881NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is a complex socio-cognitive subdomain that is under-researched in neurodegenerative disorders, particularly in persons with primary progressive aphasia. We studied 14 persons with non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfaPPA), and asked two questions: (1) whether persons with nfaPPA have intact or impaired ToM, with emphasis on their false belief attribution abilities, relative to healthy controls; and (2) whether false-belief attribution (a component of ToM) is associated with their syntactic and executive function (EF) abilities. False belief understanding was tested through nonverbal videos, with participants deciding whether the story ending was an appropriate end of each video scenario or not. Syntactic production abilities were measured through repetition of syntactically simple and complex sentences (comprising length-matched complement and adjunct sentences), and EF tasks, specifically, a digit-back and an attention-shifting task. Persons with nfaPPA were less accurate than controls in adapting their reasoning to the false beliefs of other agents in the nonverbal videos of the false belief attribution task. Their false belief attribution performance was significantly predicted primarily by their syntactic production, followed by their EF. The overall findings suggest that persons with nfaPPA may have impaired performances in ToM tasks, due to impairments in basic non-social cognitive functioning, such as syntactic and EF abilities.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressivePrimary Progressive Nonfluent AphasiaTheory of MindAgedAttentionComprehensionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsExecutive functionsPrimary progressive aphasiaSyntaxTheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID40252313
PMCPMC13281778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.