ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Generational Nursing Challenges: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire (MNGQ).
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study validated and adapted the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire to a Polish context and assessed its accuracy and reliability among Polish nurses.
designA cross-sectional psychometric study.
methodsThe Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire was translated, culturally adapted and validated through a structured process involving expert panel reviews, pilot testing and psychometric validation using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The study included 850 Polish nurses actively working in various healthcare settings for over 3 months. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Data collection took place over 5 months (December 2022-April 2023).
resultsThe validated questionnaire contains six subscales and 43 items. High reliability was observed across all subscales, with consistent psychometric performance. The tool demonstrated strong cultural and conceptual alignment for assessing generational differences in Polish nursing teams.
conclusionThe questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating generational diversity in nursing teams. Its application can facilitate targeted management strategies, foster collaboration and improve job satisfaction, particularly in multigenerational healthcare environments. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The questionnaire offers a practical tool for healthcare managers to address generational diversity, thereby enhancing team dynamics, reducing turnover and improving the quality of care delivery. It supports evidence-based management and education practices tailored to generational needs. IMPACT: This study develops a culturally adapted, psychometrically robust tool for assessing generational differences in Polish nursing teams. Findings have significant implications for workforce management, education and policy-making, enabling strategies to improve team collaboration, nurse satisfaction and patient outcomes in Poland and globally. REPORTING
methodThis study adhered to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines for the translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of health measurement instruments, ensuring methodological rigour and transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.