ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2025
Assessment of Learning Curve for Radiofrequency Ablation in Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: A Simulation Model Study.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study characterized the procedural learning curve of novice practitioners in mastering radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a simulated twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS) model.
methodTwelve novices practiced RFA in a TRAPS model, which was evaluated for validity. A learning curve CUSUM analysis was performed to define the number of procedures required to achieve competency. The learning plateau of needle insertion time and the number of procedures required to surpass 90% of the learning plateau were calculated.
resultsThe overall model rating of 4.26 ± 0.58 serves as validating the high learning performance. A success rate of 92.8% was achieved across 767 procedures. The average number of procedures required to achieve technical competency was 29 relative to years of experience in minimally invasive prenatal testing. After reaching this competency level, the success rate improved from 88.2% to 96.7% (P < 0.001). The needle insertion time learning curve indicated that 90% of the learning plateau was reached after 21 procedures, with the learning plateau occurring at 27.5s.
conclusionPerformance in RFA within the simulated TRAPS model improved over time. Achieving competency enhanced technical success and shortened the needle insertion process. This simulation training provides practical skills for inexperienced surgeons.
trial registrationTCTR20221005001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.