Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40252194›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Combining wood supply with reindeer foraging in the same forest: Evaluation of spacing and thinning strategies.

Emma Holmström, Urban Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma HolmströmSouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Box 190, 234 22, Alnarp, Lomma, Sweden. Emma.Holmstrom@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2025-1942
Urban NilssonSouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Box 190, 234 22, Alnarp, Lomma, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-4031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The forest land of northern Sweden is used for reindeer husbandry by the Indigenous Sámi while also being managed for wood supply. Modern forestry with dense pine Pinus sylvestris stands, maintained with high basal areas and high leaf areas, allow little light to reach the ground and the lichen cover. Finding sustainable forest management for low-productivity pine sites that combine lichen cover habitats with economically viable wood production is an urgent need. In this study, we compared pine regenerations resulting in 600, 1200 and 1800 trees per hectare when the stand reached a height of 10 m. In addition, we examined the effects of two thinning strategies: business as usual (BAU) follows thinning guidelines currently used in Swedish forests, whereas combined wood and lichen (CWL) features repeated heavy thinnings throughout the rotation. Results showed reduced production but a relatively small decline in economy in the CWL strategy compared to BAU, despite a large reduction in basal area. In addition, CWL resulted in larger but fewer trees per hectare which may also benefit biodiversity and the recreational use of the stands.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsPinus sylvestrisReindeerWoodAnimalsLichensSwedenBorealForestryMulti-use forestryPlantationScots pineTerricolous lichens

Identifiers

PMID40252194
PMCPMC12405110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.