ReviewPharmaceutical medicine2025
Challenges to Establishing Pharmaceutical Medicine as a Profession: Needs for Professional Identity and a Career Pathway: Role of Education and Training.
Review in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a Competency Framework for Medical Affairs Professionals in Australasia.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical Medicine (PM) was defined by its founding pharmaceutical physicians as a "medical/scientific discipline concerned with the discovery, development, evaluation, registration, monitoring, and medical aspects of the commercialization of medicines, for the benefit and the health of the community." Conceived as a medical specialty, the discipline encompassed several health-related professions and occupations, such as medicine, pharmacy, clinical pharmacology, drug safety and pharmacovigilance, pharmaceutical sciences, biology, health economics and others. Historically, non-medically qualified medicines development scientists from health-related disciplines have gradually grown into the medical roles within pharmaceutical organizations, regulatory agencies, and contract research organizations and today physicians and non-physicians lead drug development groups. Medicines Development Sciences (MDS) has been accepted as an alternative name. The practice of the disciplines involved in PM/MDS has evolved from an occupation to be accepted as a distinct profession, by meeting well established criteria. Despite thousands of health professionals participating today in medicines development, their awareness of the existence of this discipline, and its evolution from occupation to profession is low. The lack of professional identity and a clear career path have been identified as key factors limiting the advancement of this profession. This position paper aims to consolidate PM/MDS as an advanced profession in health sciences and propose a career path that is envisioned and championed by educational standards setting organizations like the International Federation of Association of Pharmaceutical Physicians and Pharmaceutical Medicine (IFAPP), PharmaTrain, and Global Medicines Development Professionals (GMDP) Academy with education and training as pillars for its achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.