SynthesisApplied health economics and health policy2025
Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D Instruments in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Applied health economics and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Practical Guidance.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-Y-5L Parent-Proxy Version Among Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.The patient · 2026Article
- Self-esteem patterns and the associations with health-related quality of life, self-rated health and lifestyle behaviour among junior high school students: a latent class analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe EQ-5D instruments have been widely used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in child and adolescent populations, especially the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L (beta version). Although not specifically designed for younger users, the adult versions (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) are also used in these populations. While the measurement properties of these instruments have been evaluated in children and adolescents, no systematic review to date has employed a rigorous method to assess risk of bias. Additionally, quality criteria for good measurement properties and certainty of evidence have not been thoroughly evaluated. The aim of this study was to summarize and critically appraise the evidence on the measurement properties of all EQ-5D instruments in children and adolescents.
methodsWe conducted electronic searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EconLit, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED), and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) databases up to May 2024. We included studies measuring HRQoL using either the self-reported or proxy-reported version of the EQ-5D instruments-EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-Y-3L, and EQ-5D-Y-5L-using the descriptive system, visual analogue scale, and/or utility score in children and adolescents up to 19 years of age, and that tested at least one measurement property (e.g., reliability). The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology was followed to assess risk of bias, to score results for measurement properties, and to perform an evidence synthesis using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
resultsFrom 3586 records identified through the search, 65 studies were included in this systematic review. We found moderate certainty of evidence of sufficient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. Furthermore, we found very low certainty of evidence of inconsistent relevance for the EQ-5D-Y-3L, whereas the EQ-5D-Y-5L had sufficient relevance. Almost all the measurement properties (reliability, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness) considering all the EQ-5D versions ranged from moderate certainty of evidence of insufficient results to very low certainty of evidence of insufficient results.
conclusionThere is moderate certainty of evidence that the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L have sufficient content validity. Both instruments can be recommended to measure HRQoL in children and adolescents aged 8-15 years. However, most of the measurement properties across all EQ-5D versions showed insufficient results, with certainty of evidence ranging from moderate to very low due to inconsistency and doubtful to inadequate risk of bias. Therefore, further research is needed to improve the methodological quality of studies on EQ-5D instruments for children and adolescents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42020218382 and Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r8kt9/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.