ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Identifying key targets and immune environment in wound healing based on iron overload-related genes.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wound healing (WH) poses a significant socio-economic burden due to its high incidence and recurrence rates. Iron overload (IO) could be a factor leading to delayed WH. This study thus analyzed IO-related genes (IORGs) in WH, offering possibilities for developing new therapeutic strategies. Differential gene expression (DEGs) analysis was conducted between the WH group and intact skin (IS) group, intersected with IORGs to obtain differentially expressed IORGs (DE-IORGs). Functional enrichment analysis and potential drug screening were performed on DE-IORGs. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DE-IORGs was constructed, and hub genes were identified using CytoHubba and MCODE methods. ROC curves of hub genes were plotted, and their expression levels in WH and IS groups as well as inter-gene correlations were analyzed. Additionally, immune infiltration variances in WH and IS groups, along with miRNA and TFs of hub genes, were examined. Finally, the effect of EGFR on skin wound healing was verified by scratch healing assay. 39 DE-IORGs were predominantly enriched in signaling pathways like HIF-1 signaling pathway and Th17 cell differentiation. Potential drugs for treating WH (e.g., felbamate, SA-94315, GANT-58, rucaparib) were identified. Three hub genes related to IO in WH were pinpointed (HIF1A, CDKN2A, EGFR) with diagnostic value. Immune infiltration analysis showed higher levels of immune cells like endothelial cells and macrophages in the WH group. Additionally, 55 miRNAs (e.g., hsa-mir-200a-3p, hsa-mir-218-5p) and 2 TFs (L3MBTL2, ZNF76) regulating the three hub genes were predicted. Cell experiments showed that EGFR could promote skin wound healing. The study suggested HIF1A, CDKN2A, and EGFR as potential diagnostic biomarkers for effective WH diagnosis, offering new insights into identifying potenti1al therapeutic targets for WH treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40252113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.