ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Fungal Infections Resulting From Prolonged Use of Personal Protective Equipment.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Candidemia due toMedical mycology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study is the first to investigate fungal infections resulting from prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among healthcare workers at Kütahya Health Sciences University Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research aimed to isolate, molecularly type, and assess the antifungal susceptibility of superficial fungal infection agents associated with PPE use. Additionally, the relationship between these fungi and PPE use was evaluated through a questionnaire. Samples were collected from 100 healthcare workers experiencing skin issues. Among them, all N95/FFP2 mask users, 44.3% of glove users, 36.1% of surgical mask users, and 22.9% of hair cap users reported skin reactions, with acne (n = 34) being the most common. Identified fungal isolates included Trametes hirsuta, Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus fumigatus, Rhodotorula sp., Candida sp., Pichia fermentans, and the dermatophyte Microsporum ferrugineum. Antifungal susceptibility tests revealed 47.6% resistance to fluconazole and 76.2% resistance to voriconazole (n = 16). This study provides the first institutional data on PPE-associated fungal infections and antifungal resistance in healthcare settings. These findings highlight the dermatological risks of prolonged PPE use. To mitigate these effects, healthcare institutions should prioritize high-quality materials, establish optimal usage guidelines, and provide continuous training on self-protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40252086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.