ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Managing Cardiogenic Shock With Concurrent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated with MACCE in Chinese Patients Undergoing Single-Hospitalization PCI and Transfemoral TAVR.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Cardiac function, heart failure indicators and inflammatory factors in continuous mild hypothermic hemodialysis patients after valvular heart disease surgery.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiogenic shock secondary to concomitant severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is a critical clinical condition requiring comprehensive management. CASE SUMMARY: A 75-year-old man presented with cardiogenic shock resulting from severe AS and CAD. Emergency surgery was performed. It involved initiation of extracorporeal circulatory support, followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and, subsequently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a TaurusElite valve (Peijia Medical). This strategy resulted in marked hemodynamic improvement. DISCUSSION: This case highlights the efficacy and safety of concurrent PCI and TAVR as a lifesaving strategy for cardiogenic shock patients with concomitant severe CAD and AS. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Emergency PCI with concurrent TAVR represents a viable lifesaving strategy for cardiogenic shock patients with coexisting severe CAD and AS. Prophylactic extracorporeal circulation initiation is critical in TAVR procedures for patients with cardiogenic shock to prevent circulatory collapse and maintain systemic perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.