ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Alcohol and other drug use by Australian workers: insights from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditions of Work and Increasingly High-risk Drinking Among People Employed in the Alcohol Service Industry: Applying Canada's Guidance on Alcohol and Health to a High-risk Population.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- Considering alcohol and other drug screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in two safety-sensitive industries in Australia: An exploratory qualitative study.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Present but Overlooked: A Scoping Review of Instruments and Approaches for Measuring Presenteeism Related to Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Australian population, a substantial number of people consume alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs (ATODs). As most people who use ATOD are employed, the workplace is an environment through which ATOD primary and secondary preventive health interventions can be implemented. However, resource allocation can be informed by research that determines priority industries and occupations, as indicated by the prevalence of ATOD use, numbers of users, and likelihood of use (i.e. adjusted odds ratios). A secondary analysis of the 2022-23 Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey was conducted to assess risky alcohol consumption, current smoking, and illicit drug use (past 12 months) across different industries and occupations. There were 16,281 participants for industry analyses and 17,247 participants for occupation analyses. Survey-weighted estimations of the number and prevalence of individuals who consumed ATOD were performed, followed by a series of survey-weighted logistic regression analyses to identify industries and occupations associated with increased likelihood of ATOD use. Across all substances, the industries with the highest prevalence of ATOD use were mining, construction, and accommodation and food services, while occupations with the highest estimated prevalence were technicians and trades workers and labourers. Conversely, health care and social support, along with construction, exhibited the highest estimated number of ATOD users. The adjusted regression models revealed substantial variation in the industries and occupation types associated with heightened likelihood of ATOD use. This study provides important evidence for prioritizing industries and occupations most likely to benefit from ATOD interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.