Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251980›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2025

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Neonates and Young Infants: A Phase 2a, Multicenter Prospective Trial.

John Bradley, Emmanuel Roilides, Margaret Tawadrous, Jean Li Yan, Elena Soto, Gregory G Stone, Shweta Kamat, Paurus Irani, Richard England

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04126031 (A PHASE 2A, 2-PART, OPEN-LABEL, NON-RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DOSE TRIAL TO EVALUATE PHARMACOKINETICS, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CEFTAZIDIME AND AVIBACTAM IN NEONATES AND INFANTS FROM BIRTH TO LESS THAN 3 MONTHS OF AGE WITH SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED INFECTIONS DUE TO GRAM-NEGATIVE PATHOGENS REQUIRING INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04126031 phase2terminatednot on this map

A phase 2a, 2-part, open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, single and multiple dose trial to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ceftazidime and avibactam in neonates and infants from birth to less than 3 months of age with suspected or confirmed infections due to gram-negative pathogens requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2020 to 2022Enrolled48ConditionsGram-negative Bacterial InfectionArmsPart A: Single Dose Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Cohorts 1-3, Part B: Multiple-dose Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Cohorts 1-3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John BradleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3835-5064
Emmanuel Roilides3rd Department of Pediatrics, Aristotle University and Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Margaret TawadrousResearch and Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.
Jean Li YanResearch and Development, Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Elena SotoPharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Pfizer Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Sandwich, Kent, UK.
Gregory G StoneResearch and Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.
Shweta KamatGlobal Medical Affairs, Pfizer India Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Paurus IraniGlobal Medical Affairs, Pfizer UK Ltd., Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Richard EnglandResearch and Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.

Funding

AbbViePfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase 2a study evaluated pharmacokinetics and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI; combination dosed as fixed 4:1 ratio) in neonates and young infants with suspected/confirmed infections due to Gram-negative pathogens requiring intravenous antibiotics.

methodsHospitalized neonates and infants (gestational age ≥ 26 weeks to < 3 months), enrolled sequentially into 3 age cohorts, received CAZ/AVI single dose (Part A) or multiple dose every 8 h (Part B) by 2-h intravenous infusions. Infants > 28 days (Cohort 1) received CAZ/AVI 37.5 mg/kg/dose (CAZ 30 mg/kg and AVI 7.5 mg/kg). Full-term neonates ≤ 28 days (Cohort 2) and preterm neonates ≤ 28 days (Cohort 3) received 25 mg/kg/dose (CAZ 20 mg/kg and AVI 5 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical and microbiological outcomes (Part B only) were assessed descriptively.

resultsForty-six patients received CAZ/AVI, 25 in Part A and 21 in Part B. Sepsis (39.1%) and urinary tract infection (15.2%) were the predominant diagnoses. Observed drug plasma-concentration time profiles were generally similar across cohorts. Overall, 23 patients (50%) had ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), 8 patients (17.4%) had ≥ 1 serious AE (SAE), and 2 patients (4.3%) died; no SAE or death was treatment related. In Part B, ≥ 80% of patients had favorable clinical and microbiological responses.

conclusionsPlasma exposures after single and multiple CAZ/AVI doses in neonates and young infants < 3 months old (37.5 [30/7.5] mg/kg/dose for > 28 days; 25 [20/5] mg/kg/dose for ≤ 28 days) were similar to approved doses for older children. The safety profile of CAZ/AVI was as expected based on previous observations. Study funded by Pfizer. Trial registration: NCT04126031.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousMaleProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeDrug Combinationsantibiotic therapyantimicrobial resistanceGram-negative bacterianeonatal infectionsepsis

Identifiers

PMID40251980
PMCPMC12117184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.