SynthesisClinical cardiology2025
Short-Term, Mid-Term, and Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Valves: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices: A Contemporary Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Review
- Early Echocardiographic Changes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comparative Analysis of Different Transcatheter Aortic Valve Systems.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Procedural and Device Neutrality of Post-TAVI Renal Outcomes: A Multivariable Analysis of Valve Type, Size, and Anatomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComparisons of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable (BEV) versus self-expanding (SEV) valves are limited. HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to compare clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of BEV and SEV at short-term (30 days), midterm (1 year), and long-term (> 1 year) endpoints.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until July 2024 for randomized controlled trials. Random-effect model (DerSimonian-Laird method) was used to pool the risk ratios (RR), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsA total of 10 studies comprising 4325 patients (2295 BEV, 2030 SEV) were included. In short-term, cardiovascular (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.87) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.81) were lower in the BEV group. Risk of moderate to severe paravalvular leak (PVL) was lower among BEV patients in short-term (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.17-0.49) and long-term (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.1-0.79). A limited number of studies showed a greater risk of clinical valve thrombosis on BEV in midterm and long-term. The need for permanent pacemaker implantation was lower in BEV at both short-term (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.87), and midterm (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94). The SEV group had a larger effective orifice area with lower mean transvalvular pressure gradient at all endpoints.
conclusionsBEV is associated with reduced risk of clinical outcomes in short-term; however, most differences diminish in longer evaluations, except for moderate to severe PVL, which remains elevated for SEV. SEVs had better hemodynamic results and lower risk of clinical valve thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.