Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251879›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2025

The Effects of Conformational Sampling and QM Region Size in QM/MM Simulations: An Adaptive QM/MM Study With Model Systems.

Holden Paz, Silvan Beck, Richmond Lee, Junming Ho, Haibo Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holden PazSchool of Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Silvan BeckSchool of Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Richmond LeeSchool of Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Junming HoSchool of Chemistry, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Haibo YuSchool of Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1099-2803

Funding

Australian Research Council CE230100021Australian Research Council DE210100053Australian Research Council DP210102698Australian Research Council DP220103458Australian Research Council FT240100584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular properties in combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations have been shown to be dependent on the size of the quantum mechanical (QM) region and the amount of conformational sampling. Previous studies have largely focused on enzymatic systems, which have made it difficult to distinguish the effects of QM region size and conformational sampling from other factors including QM-MM boundary artifacts and the boundary effects. This study uses the difference-based adaptive solvation QM/MM method to investigate the tautomerization reactions of alanine and aspartate in explicit solvent. The choice of computationally tractable systems enables the decoupling of QM region size effects from other factors and a direct comparison of free energy surfaces with potential energy surfaces (PESs). The results show that (1) it is crucial to properly account for thermal fluctuations along the reaction pathways, and (2) free energy surfaces converge rapidly with increasing QM region size, whereas charge transfer requires a slightly larger QM region to achieve convergence. These findings are expected to guide future studies of enzymatic systems and other complex systems where QM/MM methods are applied.

Indexed as

Adaptive QM/MMCombined QM/MMMinimum Energy PathsPotential of Mean ForceQM Region Size

Identifiers

PMID40251879
PMCPMC12008714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.