Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251873›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2025

IMPACT-4CCS: Integrated Modeling and Prediction Using Ab Initio and Trained Potentials for Collision Cross Sections.

Carson Farmer, Hector Medina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carson FarmerSchool of Engineering, Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA.
Hector MedinaSchool of Engineering, Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1014-2275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collision cross section (CCS) values can enhance the identification and classification of molecular contaminants such as per- and polyfluororoalkyl substances (PFAS). However, the computational burden required for large molecules, combined with the increasing number of potential PFAS candidates, can render existing methods incapable of providing sufficiently accurate results in a timely manner. Furthermore, machine learning methods struggle to generalize when the (de)protonated structure undergoes structural changes that are not common in the training dataset. In this study, we introduce IMPACT4-CCS (Integrated Modeling and Prediction using Ab initio and Trained potentials for Collision Cross Section), a novel computational workflow ensemble that comprises ab initio with machine learning tasks to accelerate accurate prediction of CCS for PFAS molecules. IMPACT-4CCS achieves comparable accuracy to current machine learning approaches, as validated using a test set of 100 molecules. Furthermore, IMPACT-4CCS exhibits better accuracy when implemented on some specific emerging PFAS subclasses, such as the nH-perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (nH-PFCA) family, for which other methods overestimate their CCS values. As far as the authors know, IMPACT-4CCS is the only existing method capable of capturing structural dynamics (i.e., hydrogen bridging) present in some large and flexible PFAS molecules. Our work demonstrates that the careful use of machine learning to accelerate traditional methods is likely to be more accurate than relying purely on machine learning on molecular graphs. Future (or recommended) work includes assessing the usefulness of IMPACT-4CCS for extending nontarget analysis to larger PFAS datasets such as the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) PFAS list in PubChem, which could be greater than 7 million molecules with diverse chemistry.

Indexed as

collision cross sectionmachine learningmass spectrometryPFAS

Identifiers

PMID40251873
PMCPMC12008713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.