Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251825›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025

Comparison of the effectiveness of visual acuity measurements for amblyopia screening at the age of 36 and 45 months and difference in severity of amblyopia detected.

M A J Telleman, F Sloot, S J Benjamins, S E Loudon, B Spek, H J Simonsz, Orthoptic Research Group

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M A J TellemanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-2157
F SlootDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-4243
S J BenjaminsChild Healthcare, ICARE, Meppel, the Netherlands.
S E LoudonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
B SpekEpidemiology and Datascience, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H J SimonszDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5899-6654
Orthoptic Research Group

Funding

Stichting Lijf en Leven
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEfficiency of visual screening using visual acuity measurement (VAM) in children screened at 45 months of age (45 m) and screened at both 36 months of age (36 m) and 45 m was investigated by determining failure, repeat and referral rates and amblyopia detection.

methodsData from Dutch screening records and treating orthoptists of 10 811 children born July 2011-June 2012 were analysed. Based on the national vision screening guideline, the screening outcome was identified as: sufficient/insufficient/non-cooperative VAM, repeat examination or referral. Data analysis consisted of determining (1) non-cooperative and insufficient VAM rates at 45 m, (2) 45 m referral policy after insufficient and non-cooperative VAM, (3) 45 m outcome for non-cooperative or insufficient VAM without referral at 36 m, (4) efficiency of amblyopia detection at 36 or 45 m and (5) amblyopia severity and type.

resultsOverall, at 45 m, 8.3% were non-cooperative and 15.6% had insufficient VAM. Regarding efficiency, at 45 m, 1.47 VAMs were needed to detect one case of amblyopia (N = 86), as compared to 1.80 at 36 m (N = 131). The median [IQR] logMAR visual acuity of amblyopic eyes detected at 36 m (0.58 [0.30]) was lower as compared to 45 m (0.52 [0.26]) (p = 0.01) and the interocular difference was larger (p = 0.05). At 45 m, 86 amblyopes were detected; 77 of these had had a VAM at 36 m but had not been referred: 38 passed VAM at 36 m, and referral of 39 was not realized.

conclusionVisual acuity measurement at 45 m was more efficient as compared to 36 m. The non-cooperative rate at 45 m (8.3%) was lower than previously reported for 36 m (16.6%). Half the amblyopes detected at 45 m had had a sufficient VAM at 36 m.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVision ScreeningVisual AcuityChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Indexamblyopiascreening efficiencyscreening referral ratevision screeningvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID40251825
PMCPMC12531601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.