ArticleThe British journal of educational psychology2025
Student motivation and instructional clarity: Linking experience sampling method data to objective behavioural observations.
Article in The British journal of educational psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Student motivation and instructional clarity: Linking experience sampling method data to objective behavioural observations.The British journal of educational psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
THEORETICAL
backgroundPrevious studies indicate that students' learning motivation varies across learning situations and is influenced by situational characteristics such as teaching behaviour. We focus on instructional clarity as one factor that may influence expectancies and task values. AIMS AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS: This study combines a previously published dataset of university students' experience sampling method (ESM) self-reports about their current motivation with unpublished video recorded data of the same learning situations. We examined how lecturers' instructional clarity predicted states of students' learning motivation. SAMPLE(S): One hundred and fifty-five preservice teachers assessed their situated expectancies and task values three times within each weekly 90-minute lecture over the period of 10 weeks. Simultaneously, video recordings of the lecturer were made and coded qualitatively for instructional clarity.
methodsWe then combined students' motivation to lecturers' instructional clarity in the same learning situations. We used cross-classified multilevel models to examine the associations of ESM surveys of students' motivation (level 1; n = 2227), nested in students (level 2a; n = 155), to ratings of lecturers' instructional clarity from videos (level 2b; n = 81).
resultsOur findings indicated that none of the three indicators of instructional clarity (detail of explanation, variation of explanation and logical inconsistency) predicted global measures of motivation at the learning situation level. When exploring further into the facets of motivation, a detailed explanation predicted expectations of success and effort costs. RELEVANCE: Overall, the idea of combining objective observation and subjective assessments emerged as valuable for adequately mapping complex dynamics in teaching-learning situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.