ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025
Nocebo Effect on Pain-Related Autonomic Responses in a State of Experimentally-Induced Sensitization.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beware of What You Expect? A Partial Replication Study on the Behavioral and Psychophysiological Effects of Negative Expectations on Mechanical Hypersensitivity.Psychophysiology · 2026Trial
- Placebo Effect on Pain-Related Autonomic Responses in a State of Experimentally-Induced Sensitization.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhanced pain-related autonomic responses were reported after experimentally-induced secondary mechanical hyperalgesia (SMH) in healthy individuals as well as in a variety of chronic pain cohorts. Stimulus-induced autonomic responses can also be modulated by positive and negative expectations towards the applied stimulus. This study aimed to investigate the influence of negative expectations on pain-related autonomic responses after experimentally-induced SMH.
methodsForty healthy participants (20 females) were recruited and assigned to a NOCEBO or a NAïVE group. Phasic skin conductance responses (SCR) and tonic background skin conductance level (SCL) were recorded in response to 10 pinprick stimuli applied to both volar forearms. On one arm, all stimuli were applied (EXP-arm) before (PRE) and after (POST) an experimental heat pain model to induce SMH. The other arm served as the control (CTRL-arm). The NOCEBO group was instructed that the stimuli will be 'more intense and painful' in the POST-assessment. The NAïVE group did not receive any instructions. Pain ratings were matched to a numeric rating scale 4 across all assessments to control for subjective pain perception.
resultsOnly the combination of induced SMH and negative expectation (i.e., EXP-arm in the NOCEBO group) increased the pinprick-evoked phasic SCRs (p < 0.001) from PRE to POST. Tonic background SCL increased from PRE to POST (p < 0.01) independent of stimulation area (i.e., EXP-arm or CTRL-arm) or group (i.e., NOCEBO or NAïVE).
conclusionsThese results demonstrate facilitatory effects of top-down modulatory processes (i.e., negative expectations) on pain-related autonomic responses after experimentally-induced SMH. SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed a facilitatory effect of negative expectation on enhanced pain-related autonomic responses in a state of experimentally-induced sensitisation in healthy participants. Hence, pain-related autonomic responses are shaped by both bottom-up (nociceptive input) and top-down (expectation) modulatory processes. This leads to the clinical implication that increased pain-related autonomic responses reported in individuals with chronic pain might not solely reflect pain hypersensitivities through nociceptive sensitisation, but also exaggerated negative expectation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.