ArticleInternational wound journal2025
RETRACTION: Analysis of circRNA-mRNA Expression Profiles and Functional Enrichment in Diabetes Mellitus Based on High Throughput Sequencing.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionW. Zhao, X. Meng, and J. Liang, "Analysis of circRNA-mRNA Expression Profiles and Functional Enrichment in Diabetes Mellitus Based on High Throughput Sequencing," International Wound Journal 20, no. 5 (2023): 1253-1262, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13838. The above article, published online on 03 May 2022, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. In addition, further investigation by the publisher found discrepancies between the figures and data and the statements made in the results, contradictions between the methodology and data, and flaws in the research concept and design that fundamentally compromise the validity of the results presented in the article. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.