ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Machine learning prediction of HER2-low expression in breast cancers based on hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence driven protein design and sustainable nanomedicine for advanced theranostics.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Deep learning for predicting pituitary neuroendocrine tumour lineage and high-risk subtypes from histology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatment with HER2-targeted therapies is recommended for HER2-positive breast cancer patients with HER2 gene amplification or protein overexpression. Interestingly, recent clinical trials of novel HER2-targeted therapies demonstrated promising efficacy in HER2-low breast cancers, raising the prospect of including a HER2-low category (immunohistochemistry, IHC) score of 1 + or 2 + with non-amplified in-situ hybridization for HER2-targeted treatments, which necessitated the accurate detection and evaluation of HER2 expression in tumors. Traditionally, HER2 protein levels are routinely assessed by IHC in clinical practice, which not only requires significant time consumption and financial investment but is also technically challenging for many basic hospitals in developing countries. Therefore, directly predicting HER2 expression by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining should be of significant clinical values, and machine learning may be a potent technology to achieve this goal.
methodsIn this study, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) classification model using whole slide image of HE-stained slides to automatically assess HER2 status.
resultsA publicly available TCGA-BRCA dataset and an in-house USTC-BC dataset were applied to evaluate our AI model and the state-of-the-art method SlideGraph + in terms of accuracy (ACC), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and F1 score. Overall, our AI model achieved the superior performance in HER2 scoring in both datasets with AUC of 0.795 ± 0.028 and 0.688 ± 0.008 on the USCT-BC and TCGA-BRCA datasets, respectively. In addition, we visualized the results generated from our AI model by attention heatmaps, which proved that our AI model had strong interpretability.
conclusionOur AI model is able to directly predict HER2 expression through HE images with strong interpretability, and has a better ACC particularly in HER2-low breast cancers, which provides a method for AI evaluation of HER2 status and helps to perform HER2 evaluation economically and efficiently. It has the potential to assist pathologists to improve diagnosis and assess biomarkers for companion diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.