Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251667›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Transesophageal echocardiography as the final defense in impending paradoxical embolism: a case report.

Zhuangyuan Chen, Mingjing Chen, Haibo Song, Yauwai Chan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhuangyuan ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518053, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Mingjing ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Haibo SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. pdasonghaibo@163.com.
Yauwai ChanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The University of Hongkong, Hongkong, 999077, People's Republic of China. cywz01@hku-szh.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpending paradoxical embolism (IPDE) involves venous thrombi crossing a patent foramen ovale, posing high risks of systemic embolization. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old male was admitted to the operation theater due to heart failure symptoms, with the original plan of undergoing atrial mass resection and mitral valve replacement. Intra-operative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) diagnosed the patient with IPDE and acute pulmonary embolism. And this critical diagnosis immediately altered the surgical decision-making process, which included pulmonary artery thrombectomy. The successful treatment of this case was significantly attributed to the intraoperative TEE examination, which provided essential real-time diagnostic information guiding the surgical approach. This case highlighted the importance of intra-operative TEE in management of IPDE for surgical planning.

conclusionsTEE is the final defense in IPDE. To optimize surgical outcomes and avert misdiagnosis, routine utilization of intraoperative TEE is highly recommended for similar cases.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, TransesophagealEmbolism, ParadoxicalForamen Ovale, PatentPulmonary EmbolismHumansMaleMiddle AgedThrombectomyImpending paradoxical embolismPulmonary artery embolismTransesophageal echocardiography (TEE)

Identifiers

PMID40251667
PMCPMC12007277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.