ArticleHuman genomics2025
Functional analysis of a novel FOXL2 mutation in blepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus syndrome type II and elucidation of the genotype-phenotype correlation.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by genetic mutations. However, the genotype-phenotype correlation remains unclear. This study aimed to identify mutations in a Chinese family with BPES and elucidate the genotype-phenotype relationship.
methodsA comprehensive clinical and molecular genetic analysis was conducted on a three-generation Chinese family with BPES, which was prospectively enrolled at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Affected individuals underwent systematic phenotyping, including detailed physical and ophthalmic evaluations. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples and subjected to whole-exome sequencing, followed by targeted Sanger sequencing for variant validation. Candidate disease-associated variants were analyzed using in silico predictive algorithms to assess their potential structural and functional impact on encoded proteins. To further elucidate the pathogenicity of the identified mutation, functional studies were performed, including immunofluorescence-based subcellular localization assays and quantitative real-time PCR to evaluate transcriptional regulatory effects.
resultsSix affected individuals of this pedigree presented with canonical BPES features including small palpebral fissures, ptosis, epicanthus inversus, and telecanthus, without premature ovarian failure, consistent with a diagnosis of BPES type II. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a heterozygous missense mutation (c.313 A > C:p.N105H) in FOXL2, which was subsequently validated by Sanger sequencing. This variant demonstrated complete cosegregation with the BPES phenotype across all affected family members. According to ACMG guidelines, the variant was classified as Likely Pathogenic (PS1 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3). In silico pathogenicity prediction tools classified the p.N105H variant as deleterious. Immunofluorescence assays revealed aberrant nuclear aggregation of the mutant FOXL2 protein, and functional characterization via quantitative real-time PCR demonstrated no significant dysregulation (P > 0.05) of downstream targets (STAR, OSR2).
conclusionsThis study provides functional evidence of the pathogenic FOXL2 mutation (c.313 A > C, p.N105H) in BPES type II, demonstrating its disruptive effects on protein localization while maintaining normal transcriptional activity of downstream targets. These findings expand the mutational spectrum of FOXL2 related disorders and enhance our understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations in BPES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.