ArticleBMC surgery2025
Effectiveness and incidence of adverse reactions of nasal endoscopic surgery in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of endoscopic minimally invasive surgery on olfactory function and quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo research and examine the efficacy of nasal endoscopic surgery in management of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps, as well as how it affects the likelihood of adverse responses.
methodsThe collecting of samples was scheduled to take place between January 2020 and December 2022. The traditional surgery team consisted of 80 clients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps. Retrospective analysis of clinical information of two teams of clients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps who underwent surgery using different techniques, contrast of the surgical conditions, postoperative complications, recovery time, and postoperative pain scores between the two teams, as well as postoperative serum inflammatory factor indexes, immune function indexes, sleep state indexes, and quality of life grades of the two teams before and after.
resultsThe study team had procedure in less time than traditional surgery team(P < 0.05), and they experienced less intraoperative blood loss than traditional surgery team. The values in study team were lower than those in traditional surgery team in terms of overall incidence rate of postoperative adverse responses(P < 0.05). The grades of four aspects of quality of life in two teams after the operation greatly improved from those before operation. The grades of four aspects of quality of life in the two teams after operation greatly improved from those before operation, all P < 0.05.
conclusionIn contrast to conventional open sinus surgery, using nasal endoscope on clients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps can successfully remove polyps from nasal cavity, open sinuses, and lower risk of intraoperative problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.