ArticleBMC urology2025
Enhancing pediatric robotic pyeloplasty with a no-touch urothelium approach: a case series.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has advanced minimally invasive urology. However, the absence of haptic feedback may increase the risk of tissue trauma. This case series evaluates a no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty to minimize urothelial handling and assess its feasibility and short-term outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective case series reviewed 20 pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with robotic-assisted pyeloplasty between 2019 and 2022. In 10 cases, a no-touch urothelium approach was applied to minimize direct tissue handling. Patient selection, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were documented.
resultsThe no-touch approach was successfully implemented in all cases without intraoperative complications. Median console time was 98 min (IQR: 81-131). Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with significant improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis in all cases. No major complications occurred, and no anastomotic strictures were observed during follow-up.
conclusionsThe no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible approach that maintains surgical efficiency while minimizing direct urothelial handling. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to validate its potential benefits.
trial registrationThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (permit nr 5485), Finland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.