ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Smart contours: deep learning-driven internal gross tumor volume delineation in non-small cell lung cancer using 4D CT maximum and average intensity projections.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelineating the internal gross tumor volume (IGTV) is crucial for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Deep learning (DL) enables the automation of this process; however, current studies focus mainly on multiple phases of four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT), which leads to indirect results. This study proposed a DL-based method for automatic IGTV delineation using maximum and average intensity projections (MIP and AIP, respectively) from 4D CT.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 124 patients with NSCLC and divided them into training (70%, n = 87) and validation (30%, n = 37) cohorts. Four-dimensional CT images were acquired, and the corresponding MIP and AIP images were generated. The IGTVs were contoured on 4D CT and used as the ground truth (GT). The MIP or AIP images, along with the corresponding IGTVs (IGTV
resultsThe attention U-net model trained on AIP images presented a mean DSC of 0.871 ± 0.048 and mean HD95 of 2.958 ± 2.266 mm, whereas the model trained on MIP images achieved a mean DSC of 0.852 ± 0.053 and mean HD95 of 3.209 ± 2.136 mm. Among the models, attention U-net and U-net achieved similar results, considerably surpassing V-net.
conclusionsDL models can automate IGTV delineation using MIP and AIP images, streamline contouring, and enhance the accuracy and consistency of lung cancer radiotherapy planning to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.